Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

NANCEY SILVERS, — v. SONY PICTURES, ENTERTAINMENT INC., —, 01-56069 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 01-56069 Visitors: 26
Filed: Jun. 09, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: 370 F.3d 1252 Nancey SILVERS, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. SONY PICTURES, Entertainment Inc., Defendant — Appellant. No. 01-56069. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 9, 2004. Steven Glaser, Gelfand & Glaser, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Ronald S. Rauchberg, Esq., Proskauer Rose, LLP, New York, NY, Simon Block, Esq., Proskauer Rose LLP, George P. Schiavelli, Esq., Benjamin G. Shatz, Esq., Reed Smith, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Jon A. Baumgarten, Esq., Proskauer Rose LLP, Washi
More

370 F.3d 1252

Nancey SILVERS, Plaintiff — Appellee,
v.
SONY PICTURES, Entertainment Inc., Defendant — Appellant.

No. 01-56069.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 9, 2004.

Steven Glaser, Gelfand & Glaser, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ronald S. Rauchberg, Esq., Proskauer Rose, LLP, New York, NY, Simon Block, Esq., Proskauer Rose LLP, George P. Schiavelli, Esq., Benjamin G. Shatz, Esq., Reed Smith, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Jon A. Baumgarten, Esq., Proskauer Rose LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer